Yes, that seems to solve the problem as scary as that is. When you think of the binary abilities of patch you understand the concern. It does not work on just text files ... supposedly. I've never played with patching binaries but again, supposedly, you can.
Hello, we're Microsoft, security by keyword...!
However, since I build on XP as much or more than Vista and beyond, I'll never remember to use the different name on what machine ... that's why I made the dumb SU4Win.
I'm just tired of having to stop, open up a console as admin and CD\ing my way back to where I was just so I could type;
patch -p1 -b < filename.patch
I need to do that for no other part of the process, so that is why I made su4w. Stupid as it is ... did it work for you?
Now in your email on su4w you said "I think you like linux" ... lol ... so far from the truth that is! I do however feel, if Windoze is going to be like Linux this way, they should at least give the same tools .... but no.